and Britains promise, it still does not give them the right to drive Palestinians out of their homes. In contrast, a state is a political identity and a location with borders and independent government recognized by other nations as autonomous. The two state solution has been rejected and there is no good reason to believe that anything will change. Jews already began moving to Palestine because of the trouble they were having in Europe. 9 That is what ultimately began the conflict between the Jews and Arabs. The purpose of this essay is to look into the ethnic conflict of Israel and Palestine and to reveal the basis of the issue as well as to see how the countries are dealing with. The United States officially took part in the negotiation between Israel and Palestine and approved the policy of land for peace. Israel lobby in the.S is well-financed, highly organized.
Compared to other Quartet states, Russia recognises Hamas legitimacy and the control the Gaza Strip by this Islamic party. The particular focus is made on the question why states like US, Russia, EU etc support either side of the ongoing conflict. These issues have varied over the time from the distribution of power to religion, race, and ethnicity and. It was uncertain what the criterion was for deciding that the Palestinian leadership acted what is difficult in writing an essay decisively against the terror attacks. The direct discussions between the parties assume that the Palestinians immediately undertake and unconditional cessation of violence, which should be accompanied by supportive measures undertaken by Israel. Without some coming to terms and forgiving the past, the Israeli - Palestinian conflict is likely to continue. Resolutions feeling the support of the.S. There are six main causes for the Palestinians and Jews to be in such a conflict: * Land * Palestinian refugees wanted to go home, but Israel declined * Water Israel is taking more water resources to itself, though it should be distributed fairly. However when Sharons party was succeeded by the more aggressive and pro-Israeli Likud party, led by the incumbent Benjamin Netanyahu, any chance of a treaty vanished and tension resurfaced. The result could be a new version of the cold war, which as history shows, ended.
At that, the UN Security Council which is primarily responsible for sustaining international peace and security should adequately respond to the hazardous developments in the Middle East situation. It seems that Israel cannot get along with its neighbors and violence continues to be the mode of communication. There are few conflicts as divisive to the world as that of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.